Stephanie's Political Arena

Critiques and Perspectives on National Politics and More

Posts Tagged ‘health care reform

New Lows for Obama and Reid-Pelosi Congress

with 2 comments

President Obama and his Congressional allies would be wise to exercise greater caution as they prepare for another round on health care reform following Thursday’s summit in Washington.   According to the latest Rasmussen poll, just posted today, Obama’s approval rating has hit a new low: 40 percent of Americans now say he is a “good or excellent leader,” compared to 47 percent one month ago and 56 percent one year ago.

Meanwhile, under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi in the House and Harry Reid in the Senate, the Congressional approval rating now stands at 10 percent, according to Rasmussen.  Seventy-one percent of Americans indicated that they believe Congress is “doing a poor job” in managing the nation’s affairs at home and abroad.   As Scott Rasmussen points out, Americans today are “united in the belief that our political system is broken, that our politicians are corrupt, and that neither major political party has all the answers.”

So, where again is that “hope and change?”


Written by Stephanie

March 1, 2010 at 3:41 am

Instead of Beer, Transparency and Negotiation over Health Care Reform are the Focus of Obama’s Latest Summit

with 2 comments

Today, President Obama and Congressional delegates from both sides of the aisle gathered in Washington to discuss the revival of health care reform during a televised health care summit.  Without the beer Obama had provided during a previous summit, leaders sparred from time to time over the daunting task before them in reshaping the nation’s health care system.  The summit began with an irritated Obama scolding U.S. Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Virginia) for bringing a copy of the 2,400-page bill with him, calling it a “political stunt that gets in the way of lawmakers having a serious discussion.”  To his credit, Rep. Cantor had likely read the bill, highlighting certain sections he wished to discuss during the summit.

In any case, lawmakers in attendance exchanged stories, facts, and blame as they strategized over how to insure 47 million Americans without burdening future generations with trillions of dollars of debt, not to mention millions more Americans who are satisfied with their health care coverage.  What seemed to be lost on most of the attendees (I won’t mention any names) is that in a nation of more than 300 million people, just 15 percent of the population is uninsured.  Why not focus on a plan to get just this segment of the population insured as opposed to overhauling an entire system that encompasses nearly 20 percent of our nation’s GDP?  Why not focus on a way to help small businesses insure more, if not all, of their employees (through incentives such as tax breaks and payroll tax holidays that will free up more revenue to spend on better benefits)?  Better yet, why not hand health care reform over to the states in order to focus on other concerns such as the economy and foreign policy, particularly Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran?

Among the best proposals I’ve seen in confronting the obstacles embedded within health care reform is that which was made by Stuart Butler of the Heritage Foundation.  He makes the case for state control over health care reform as opposed to federal control, particularly for the benefit of cost savings.  It makes sense for the simple fact that what may work for Vermont (the healthiest state in the country for 2009 according to a United Health Foundation study) may not work for Mississippi (ranked as the unhealthiest state in the country in the same study).  Giving states control over health care reform would enable them to better address the ailments most prevalent within each of their health care systems (chronic illnesses, insurance mazes, low reimbursement rates, etc.) as opposed to, say, forcing Vermont taxpayers to fund insurance coverage for Mississippians.

Written by Stephanie

February 26, 2010 at 6:15 am